Those of you in Nebraska, explain this too me.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/05/25/local/doc4474ed34cdca3829136003.txt
So, I guess the rule is, molest away if you are short?
Granted, I don't know everything about the case - what the 2 counts were, how old the minor was, etc. but at face value, does not look good.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/05/25/local/doc4474ed34cdca3829136003.txt
So, I guess the rule is, molest away if you are short?
Granted, I don't know everything about the case - what the 2 counts were, how old the minor was, etc. but at face value, does not look good.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:15 am (UTC)He had sex with his fiancee's (hopefully his former fiancee) 12-year-old daughter.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:18 am (UTC)Guess I need more details. From my years of investigating child sexual abuse, I have seen people who have done worse walk out without any criminal charges period.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:51 am (UTC)Depending on the circumstances of the crime, this could be suitable punishment. But this guy better be watched like a hawk. Any little slip and probation time is over. (plus the victims should be ok with this. (I'm including the girls parents here)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:54 am (UTC)WTH, is right....
Date: 2006-05-26 12:06 pm (UTC)That being said, IF this guy actually had inappropriate contact with a 10-12 year old or younger...this judge is COMPLETELY off her freakin' rocker. I agree though...more information is definitely needed than is provided in the article to determine the appropriate level of outrage. The thing is though, the article says up front "child". So, unless the reporter is overextending that definition, this guy should be thrown in with the other animals and locked up for the rest of his life. I don't care how "small" he is.
AND, they should forcibly remove certain body parts.....
HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND EVERYONE!!!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 07:39 pm (UTC)